Fix ByteBuddy & Hibernate Validator Issues in Quarkus
Fix ByteBuddy & Hibernate Validator Issues in Quarkus

ByteBuddy Dynamic Class Not Validating Jakarta Annotations with Hibernate Validator

Resolve ByteBuddy dynamic class validation issues with Hibernate Validator and Jakarta annotations in Java and Quarkus.6 min


When working with dynamic class creation in Java, ByteBuddy is one of the most popular and powerful tools at your disposal. However, developers often encounter an issue where dynamically created ByteBuddy classes are not properly validating Jakarta validation annotations using Hibernate Validator.

This problem occurs frequently in Java frameworks such as Quarkus, where dynamic class generation enhances flexibility and scalability. Today, let’s explore what causes this issue and how you can resolve it effectively.

What is ByteBuddy and Why Use it?

ByteBuddy is a library designed to simplify Java bytecode generation. It helps you dynamically create Java classes on-the-fly without manually dealing with bytecode, saving significant effort.

Dynamic classes offer tremendous flexibility. Imagine you need forms or DTOs with fields determined at runtime (such as dynamic user input forms). Instead of hard-coding numerous Java classes, ByteBuddy builds these classes dynamically, boosting efficiency and flexibility.

Dynamic Class Creation Explained Clearly

When using ByteBuddy, creating dynamic Java classes involves defining new classes entirely at runtime. Consider how you’d typically define a static class manually:


public class User {
    @NotNull
    private String username;

    @Min(18)
    private Integer age;

    // getters and setters
}

Now, imagine creating this class dynamically using ByteBuddy. ByteBuddy allows you to inject fields, methods, annotations, and constructors programmatically:


Class dynamicClass = new ByteBuddy()
    .subclass(Object.class)
    .name("com.example.DynamicUser")
    .defineField("username", String.class, Visibility.PRIVATE)
    .annotateField(new NotNullImpl())
    .defineField("age", Integer.class, Visibility.PRIVATE)
    .annotateField(new MinImpl(18))
    .make()
    .load(getClass().getClassLoader())
    .getLoaded();

But what’s causing ByteBuddy generated classes not to validate with Jakarta annotations?

Using Jakarta Annotations with Hibernate Validator

Jakarta Bean Validation annotations (formerly Javax Validation annotations) provide powerful validation mechanisms that ensure correctness before data reaches your business logic.

Hibernate Validator implements these annotations seamlessly for data validation. Typical annotations include @NotNull, @Min, @Max, and many others.

When using dynamic ByteBuddy classes, however, these annotations sometimes don’t trigger correctly. Often, validation anomalies are due to annotation metadata inconsistencies or incorrect class loading situations.

Indentifying the Issue: A Code Walkthrough

Let’s explore a complete scenario using ByteBuddy and Hibernate Validator:

Step 1: Creating the Dynamic Class (DynamicPojoFactory.java)


public class DynamicPojoFactory {
    public Class createDynamicPojo(List fieldDefinitions, String className) throws Exception {
        ByteBuddy byteBuddy = new ByteBuddy();
        DynamicType.Builder builder = byteBuddy.subclass(Object.class).name(className);

        for(FieldDefinition fieldDef : fieldDefinitions){
            builder = builder
                .defineField(fieldDef.getFieldName(), fieldDef.getFieldType(), Visibility.PRIVATE)
                .annotateField(fieldDef.getValidationAnnotations());
        }

        return builder.make().load(getClass().getClassLoader()).getLoaded();
    }
}

The FieldDefinition Class

This class specifies fields to generate dynamically and includes validation annotations:


public class FieldDefinition {
    private String fieldName;
    private Class fieldType;
    private Annotation[] validationAnnotations;

    // constructors, getters, setters
}

Step 2: Implementing Validation in TestResource.java

In your Resource class, you might attempt something like:


@Path("/test")
public class TestResource {
    
    private Validator validator;

    public TestResource(){
        ValidatorFactory factory = Validation.buildDefaultValidatorFactory();
        validator = factory.getValidator();
    }

    @POST
    @Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
    public Response validateDynamicEntity(Map data) throws Exception{
        FieldDefinition usernameField = new FieldDefinition("username", String.class, new Annotation[]{new NotNullImpl()});
        FieldDefinition ageField = new FieldDefinition("age", Integer.class, new Annotation[]{new MinImpl(18)});

        DynamicPojoFactory factory = new DynamicPojoFactory();
        Class dynamicClass = factory.createDynamicPojo(
            Arrays.asList(usernameField, ageField), "com.example.DynamicUser");

        Object dynamicInstance = dynamicClass.getDeclaredConstructor().newInstance();
        for (Map.Entry entry : data.entrySet()){
            Field field = dynamicClass.getDeclaredField(entry.getKey());
            field.setAccessible(true);
            field.set(dynamicInstance, entry.getValue());
        }

        Set> violations = validator.validate(dynamicInstance);

        if(violations.isEmpty()){
            return Response.ok("Validated Successfully").build();
        } else {
            return Response.status(400).entity(violations.toString()).build();
        }
    }
}

Despite proper implementation, this could fail due to several common ByteBuddy-related validation issues.

Configuration: Managing Dependencies with Gradle

Your build.gradle file must correctly specify dependencies:


dependencies {
    implementation 'net.bytebuddy:byte-buddy:1.14.9'
    implementation 'org.hibernate.validator:hibernate-validator:8.0.1.Final'
    implementation 'jakarta.validation:jakarta.validation-api:3.0.2'
    implementation 'io.quarkus:quarkus-resteasy-reactive'
    implementation 'io.quarkus:quarkus-resteasy-reactive-jackson'
}

Ensure you use matching Jakarta and Hibernate Validator versions for smooth integration.

Troubleshooting Common Validation Issues

  • Annotations not retained at runtime: Ensure validation annotation classes are RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME.
  • Incorrect Annotation implementations: Always use correct annotation proxies or direct annotation instantiation.
  • Classloader conflicts: Verify dynamic class uses correct classloader accessible to Hibernate Validator.

For debugging, enable Hibernate Validator debug logging to see detailed error messages and trace the exact issue easily.

Running QuarkusDev and Checking Validation Results

Start your application in Quarkus development mode by running:


./gradlew quarkusDev

Check validation by posting JSON data to your endpoint:


POST http://localhost:8080/test
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "username": null,
  "age": 16
}

If validation is correct, the response should clearly mention constraint violations. Also, monitor logs generated by Quarkus to spot warnings or errors immediately.

  • Check logs: Look for “Unable to validate field” or similar messages.
  • Ensure proper constraint violation objects appear clearly.

Making Dynamic Classes Work Seamlessly with Validation

Dynamic class creation paired with Jakarta annotations and Hibernate Validator can significantly streamline Java application development. But addressing annotation retention, correct annotation instantiation, proper classloader selection, and configuration management is crucial for expected functionality.

If you correctly tackle each troubleshooting step, ByteBuddy classes validate seamlessly, offering powerful runtime flexibility without sacrificing type safety or data validation.

Have you faced similar issues in your projects? Share your experiences and any additional insights in the comments. We’d love to hear your strategies or innovative solutions around dynamic Java classes!

References & Further Reading


Like it? Share with your friends!

Shivateja Keerthi
Hey there! I'm Shivateja Keerthi, a full-stack developer who loves diving deep into code, fixing tricky bugs, and figuring out why things break. I mainly work with JavaScript and Python, and I enjoy sharing everything I learn - especially about debugging, troubleshooting errors, and making development smoother. If you've ever struggled with weird bugs or just want to get better at coding, you're in the right place. Through my blog, I share tips, solutions, and insights to help you code smarter and debug faster. Let’s make coding less frustrating and more fun! My LinkedIn Follow Me on X

0 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *